
Composition 2.10
Flashe and gouache on paper
8.5 x 9.5 inches, 2010
Tag Archives: tom burtonwood
Composition 2.10
Version Fest Fundraiser / New piece

RDC_Prototype
Painted laser cut plywood + pastel on paper on masonite
21 x 12 x 10 inches
2010
Just finished this crazy new piece, i’m about to wrap it up and take it down to Bridgeport for the Version Fest 2010 fundraiser.
The party is taking place on Sat 3rd April @ the Co-Prosperity Sphere, 3219 S. Morgan, Chicago, IL
Art works will be offered for silent auction.
Art works and services can also be won via raffle.
Many of the works may be purchased at “Buy it Now” prices!
And raffle tickets are priced one for $5 and three for $10
Winners will be announced at 11am. You can wait for the results or be text messaged after raffle tickets have been drawn.
The work is fantastic. Don’t miss this opportunity to get something awesome while helping fund the greatest little art festival in ORD.
WORKS BY:
Lora Fosberg
Anna Shteynshleyger
Tom Torluemke
Tyson Reeder
Cody Hudson
Aron Gent
Stephen Eichhorn
Juan Chavez
Mathew Hoffman
Dayton Castleman
Jeff Zimmerman
Jordan Martins
Peter Skvara
Seripop
Le Dernier Cri
Gunsho
Chris Roberson
Emily Clayton
Rod Hunting
Chad Kouri
Se Young
Nathan Baker
Scott Cowan
Caitlin Arnold
Ian Whitmore
Scott Fortino
Nick Wylie
Tom Burtonwood
Nate Lee
Zachary Abubeker
Aaron Delehanty
+ others
Services:
A Pocket Guide to Hell Tour by Paul Durica
A Chicago Pedway Tour by Hui-Min Tsen
NFO XPO Booth for Version
Reuben Kincaid Project Window Installation for one month
Advertisement in Lumpen
Advertisement in Proximity
A Set of Bridgeport WPA posters
ALSO PART OF THE EVENING:
Performances by: MR 666 and Deep Earth.
The Hornswagglers will be slinging their specialty drinks.
$10 Admission please. (you will also get two raffle tickets)
Pattern Recognition
Pattern Recognition, pastel on paper, 14.5 x 16.5 inches, 2009
This is the second drawing in the new series.
Permutations 1.0 (first draft)
This sequence is missing a section from the end, where the cube will re-form from a spinning plane– will post this l8tr
new sketchbook project
Permutations I, time line, sketchbook page. June 2009
Working on a new project, Permutations, an animated sequence showing several variations on a unfolding cube. Sketchbook page sequence below shows a range of possible final unfolded outcomes, currently i’m working on the “master” drawings for the first full sequence. hope to have these complete by middle of week in draft format. really excited about this direction, eventually the final animation will have an audio component too.
Sketchbook sequence. June 2009
Animation sequence below shows first 7 or 8 frames from the upcoming Permutations piece….. can’t wait to get all this done and start playing with these “Containers” and adding some content!
Permutations, opening sequence, June 2009
Totally High School
It’s comedy friday again, time for some really really bad high school pieces from around 1991, that at the time i thought were really cool and “right on” but now i gotta say it’s pretty rough stuff, both conceptually and technically, enjoy….
Hospitalfield House — studio
i guess i should really make an effort to be less haphazzard with the posts, and try to upload with more cohesion, however things have been pretty hectic so i grabbed two images from my hospitalfield studio circa 1998– nothing too exciting, but i like them.
Studio, Hospitalfield House, 1998
Studio, Hospitalfield House, 1998
Unfinished Construction (destroyed)
Studio, Carbondale circa 1999-ish
wow. i found this photo today. and i’m totally thrilled about this work again! i gotta get in the studio for sure. sad thing is i don’t have ANY of this work anymore. it either got trashed or gven away. i f anyone has any of these pieces please let me know they went to a good home! totally crazy.
Social History
another essay, again no reference as yet as to what i am writing in reaction too. i know bad form. will make amends soon. UPDATE: T. J. Clark, selection from introduction to Image of the People: Gustave Courbet and the 1848 Revolution. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973 (ISBN 0-691-03982-8 pbk): pp. 10-15.
CLINTONS’ 25TH ANNIVERSARY
Against all odds, the First Marriage hits silver; Page 6
.. IlJ!’!t~r:!-!~!!:!!~!J~I~~t~i!Ii-·’-;’.. . .. :.~.-~. -h .;i:’
Su . – .:”~-”.=”:s,.;~
n- I
35(;
Chicago/Suburbs 50¢ Eisewllere For home delivery
1·888-848·4637
Y Pages 2,52 www.SUnlimBS.COm -WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2000 Sports Final
Clark silently delivers his message. Presumably a deliberate ploy as introduction and method. Who could begin a book stating one’s case explicitly?
His method is to leave details unwritten and prompt confusion. Clark writes that “it is easier to define what methods to avoid than propose a set of methods for system~tic use.” Clark removes the social history of art from systematic academic discourse because society is not a rational organism. It is prone to irrational behaviour, general attitudes, archetypes and stereotypes. Clark writes that it is im~ortant to discard those elements/methods w~ understand as conventional. Negation constructs the unwritten idea.
Clark is asking those who would seek to interpret the socially historical impact art to put their ears to the ground and listen to the public in its yarious manifestations. Social history might only be understood at ground zero away from the pie-chart Marxism.
Clark presents his thesis in three key areas of text, on pages 11/12/and 13. Thes ideas are corroborated then with evidence plucked from the 19thCentury, France. He focuses on Parisian intellectuals and their political thinKing with regard to the 1848 revolution. The avante-garde were estranged from popular revolutionart thinking because their aesthetic drive was entirely a PLAYTHING OF THE wealthy classes.
At the bottom of page 11 he notes the”hypocritical discourse” of artist and criti that precludes the public whose lack of education means they cannot enter the deb . He differentiates between public and audience, etymologically audience is close to author in structure and also intent. The public is quite different. This point is made clearer by the Freudian analogy which indicates something psychological that requires treatment. When the convention of criticism breaks down, when the artist gives something that does not present easy or clear interpretation this is the point at which the public can enter the discourse. On page 13 clark writes th the purpose of social history is to find the “general nature of structures,” that the artist encounters in a random fashion, and to “locate specific conditions of such meeting.”
What Clark does not say or write is that a social history of art requires the reaction of the public to the artwork in question. This reaction need not be prof und, no·r need it lead to the barricades. A social historical reckoning has to foc on society, its currency will be the interaction of art and life. Academics can analyse the origins and futures of society but Clark suggests that it takes socie to voice its opinions before we can be clear as to the social history of an artwo The artist works within a society, he/she is framed by their relation to their neighbours, therefore the issue of social hisotry is contained in a moebius strip that has no begining and therefore no end.
Deitcher meets Foucault uptown
In an effort to be as thorough as possible in the documenting of my art practice / experience, i’m going to upload my writings, mostly student work, from both undergraduate and graduate courses. I can’t promise that the writing will necessarily make sense removed from the context of assignments produced for assessment, nor can i promise if the writing is any good.
I’m engaging in this process firstly to archive this material digitally. Most of it was produced pre-email and almost all of it exits only in hard copy form. So i’m keen to get as much as possible a digital image file and using my super basic OCR software get the meat of each text saved as a txt file, for potential future clean up. The writing i produced at SIUC was mostly printed on Holly’s electric typewriter and often i used tihs very physical machine to introduce images and visual textures designed to either play with the texts or butt against them.
Secondly the pieces i produced for various art history classes at SIUC i often considered art works in their own right and so to my mind it makes sense to present them in this context. SOme of the ealier pieces from Loughborough are less interesting or experimental in their delivery but my musings on installation practice and so forth were foundational to my eventual phenomenological “total experience” installations at that time and now. So please bear with me.
As usual these pieces will be presented in no particular order, the first is a response to an article by David Deitcher about Michael Foucault. I will endeavor to actually determine which article this was a.s.a.p. UPDATE: here is info courtesy Carma Gorman (thank you)____ David Deitcher, “Looking at a Photograph, Looking for a History,” in The Passionate Camera: Photography and Bodies of Desire, edited by Deborah Bright. New York: Routledge, 1998 (ISBN 0415145821 pbk): pp. 22-36.
Luggage / Baggage, photocopy, source unknown
Full text via OCR scanning below (note this is text once removed, copy pasted exactly from the OCR translation for the accurate text please click this link to view the original document at full size http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3365/3605539697_e7193a325c_b.jpg
////
Deitcher meets Foucault uptown. “looking for a history/stating one’s case” Tom Burtonwood
AD438
Carma Gorman 10/24/00
1st scene: Deitcher meets Foucault,
“Who am I?”
“Who do you want to be?” “Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm”
“Boyar girl?” “Both”
“Oh Oedipus.”
L am writing about David Deitcher’s article as assigned because L am
trying to show how the insisttfut personification of the wri ter_ is in fact
a strategy to undermine traditional, patriarchal academic study, and therefore explain how this tactic may be used to posi t al ter’:c…nati ve history.”
I have used the structure laid out in Booth et a~del~~~atelY as a
counte;r- balance to what I had previously been educated”,111 post;;tcolonial ~_// ~post …. industrial Englan~ -bhe third personT “one” obviously is the royal 6we8wio in turn validates,~assimilate~, steals and ~~he knowledege
we the lOyalrUbjects garner in ~IThame. hO~(d5
Perhaps that is stretching this reading a little far, but it is in keeping with Foucault’s thesis that the reade~ role is more important
than that of the author. I certainly do want to suggest that in writing ;Y;WJ/
(par. ticu~arlY from. a.n academic perspecti v~) ~he _£.L~~ Of”th~ ~.~_~~or .-is ~~:r::~lY I Lt1?91l, s_!:~ted. It seem~, ,to r~late to that tradItIon of “he” thIS and-’.'he” that. _ ~-
or -”-h-e” (then~heathen?)!. and therefore I am comfortable suggestIng , ~ ?
that ltegardless of how’¢Ti ti¢’i:dthe wr±tirrg-pTesente~t,t6_.a?t)1ibric, ‘.’ e{ l~
~~e t~!e~~~~~r w~~~in~6~-u:-~~~_~i~~~~~- ~~~:~;~~~dt~h:~e~~~:i~:n~’r~a~~~:J- ‘e’m. ~~-
more in the camp of universal modernism. ,
——–
e.g. r
“I am a whi te male, age 26, I have studied art/and related fields f-or
some time now. I am involved directly with a’ creative process and it
/ has been my mission to involve a peripatetic visual discourse within the ~
text I submi t for cri tique ”
or
j’ “I (want to) believe … ” here Deitcher makes clear that this essay is his interpretation of a photograph and this view is not necessarily validated by
\ the canon. Dei tcher provides many of these ,examples “I am incl ined” /” I see them” /” I am incl ined” i obviously he is avlare that hi s reasoning could be wrong, and
guards his argument well. I think that this quo)e best sums up my thesis and it is taken from the Deitcher article,
“The master’s tools ,vill never dismantle the master’s house.”
Hospitalfield House / Artist in Residence
Studio, Hospitalfield House, Arbroath, Scotland, 1998. (Photo Jay Thomson).
Fresh out of Loughborough and with NO clue what i was doing i was lucky enough to be accepted as Artist in Residence at Hospitalfield House in Arbroath, on the east coast of Scotland. Nestled roughly halfway between Aberdeen and Dundee, Arboath is famous for it’s “smokies,” which are special smoked mackeral haddock (thanks Jay!), very tasty and good for u. It also has a Royal Marine base and a really awe inspiring cathedral in addition to amazing landscape and some great pubs / ale houses. There’s plenty more besides i’m sure i don’t do the town any justice at all.
Hospitalfield House is an amazing institution. I stayed there from January to April 1998 as one of two resident artists awarded the Patrick Allan-Fraser Trust Robert Fleming Trust (thanks Jay!) Artist in Residence. The photograph above shows yours truly standing in the studio. Two pieces niether of which i can remember the titles of flank me on either side. Plus there are smaller works dotted around. I remember struggling all thew way through the residency not really knowing what i was doing, fighting the old work — the pastels and drawings and yet not really making progress with the new stuff, the land art / earth works that i had planned to make. Going there in the winter didn’t help, the ground was frozen solid and it wasn’t the best time to be out in the landscape drawing either. The earthworks in L’boro were mostly about process, phenomena, economics. They were about material, and working with something i could manipulate easily, and about making something totally at odds with painting and the painting department i was graduating from. I don’t think i knew that at the time, and in Arbroath I was lost trying to make this visionary landscape thing work for me.
Studio, Hospitalfield House, Arbroath, Scotland, 1998. (Photo Jay Thomson).
My brief stay at Hospitalfield proved to be the springboard that catapulted me here to the USA and where i have been ever since. At HH i was introduced to the graduate program at SIUC and shortly afterwards accepted to their MFA prpgram. The rest as they say is history. I met some awesome people at Hospitalfield House including Jay Thomson who shots these photos, Amanda Currie who was also Artist in Residence as part of the PAtrick Allan-Fraser Trust, Willam Payne and Moira Scott who run Hospitalfield and Leah Hampton, who was traveling the world at the time and just happened to be in Scotland. I’ll post more about everyone and my adventures in the future.
Untitled, Hospitalfield House, Arbroath, Scotland, 1998. (Photo Jay Thomson).
Overload Aesthetics
Studio, Carbondale, 2000
In keeping with the diagonal slant of the previous post i present this snap shot of my studio, circa 2000, at the Glove Factory, Carbondale. One of my abiding interests are systems and the information they require to exist andthe data the produce. Part of this fascination includes being overwhelmed by information, whether undertaking research for a specific art work and not knowing where to draw the line, or attempting to define a complex system, or some other instance of massive overload, in any case there is way more data out there than we can hope to understand or parse together or see the linkages and discern the differences. One response to this phenomena for me has always been to drop the filters and just present it, warts and all, un-mediated as much as possible. i think on one level i enjoy the aesthetic of overload, of sensory over stimulation and on the other hand in the presence of so much random material i try and still develop relationships and linkages. The image above is taken from my studio in Carbondale toward the end of my 2nd yerar there. having re-newed my attraction to all things reflective i started pasting up on the studio walls pretty uch any thing and everything that seemed half way interesting without much thought as to how it would look or what it might be later on.
Anglesey
Anglesey, 1995
Despite trying to post in sequence and show development of the print making work from my 2nd year at loughborough, i find myself at a bit of a loss in terms of documentation and therefore i need to digging deeper into portfolios and perhaps even shoot some new photos of old work.
In the meantime this is a photo taken on the bleak northern coast of Anglesey. I think it was my third time to Anglesey, having been there twice while at Shelly High School. LCAD took 40 or so brave souls up there for a week of drawing from the landscape and literally being blown off the cliff faces. i think it was meant to be a sculpture trip, Paul Gent and i tagged along for the ride with a few other painters. i forget exactly when we were there but i know it was fairly nice that week in L’boro and suitably shitty on Anglesey. It’s a barren, windswept place, that the RAF seems to like using for low level practice flights. I always enjoyed trips the island and we had a whale of a time up there making drawings, hiking to kwik save for cheap wine and other such hijinks.
Don’t talk to me about class, I’ve been to Leeds!
Sketchbook page, lino cut on photocopy, 1996
Wow. totaly cubist (ha ha ha, pun intended). isometric-ish on the top face of the cube. in one point perspective on the bottom face, 2 spatial realities braque would be proud, and then that’s super imposed on a photocopy of a terraced houses in Leeds from above. it’s basic mistakes like this that make me cringe sometimes and others LOL. i think in this instance a bit of both, as i only just noticed the mistake!
anyhow i digress. this image is a good segue from the “module” bridge drawings, into modular prints. this body of work got me out of the painting dept, and into the printing dept at loughborough. i say got, all i really did was cut some lino and wander into print making to see Gill or Karen and print a bunch of stuff. the faculty in print making were very laid back and very welcoming. i spent a lot of time in there. at first making small lino cuts, one color etc, then working on more complicated 3, 4, 5 color linos. why i never learnt screen printing at that time is just beyond me as it would have been so much easier to do this work and to make awesome work now. but that’s that.
this image marks a departure from the sprawling, octopus like, chaotic morass of structure, girders, supports, buttressing and so forth that characterized the early drawings, and instead takes the form of a simple cross braced building block. in retrospect this shape readily assumes the character of a cage, a cell of some kind. not entirely trapping the detainee perhaps but nonetheless it’s is there visually.
the print making was a natural progression with the work, it meant i could clone / reproduce the modules easily and in diverse fashions. working outside painting dept was awesome and interacting with a whole new bunch of artists was really enriching, and some life long friendships were established. over next few days i’ll hope fully post a few of the notable prints from that period, before we lurch back to the sculptural / installation works that followed.
Octopus Enclosure
Untitled (octupus enclosure), pen on paper, 1996
Another drawing from my sketchbook. With this piece i started thinking more about the structures as enclosing or strangling the houses / dwellings. I like the lone chimney and the wisp of smoke in the center of the composition. i also enjoy the escher-eqse convoluted collapsing of space.
Studio Installation 1996/97
Studio Installation, mixed media, 1996 / 97
2 images, which i think are photographs of slides projected in the studio. At this time i was doing a lot of studio scale installations, building the total environment pieces, photographing them as slides, and projecting them back onto the installation in question or some other construction in the studio. So the effect was to break up the space several times and fragment it in interesting ways. these two images are i think projected onto a blank wall however. but u get the general idea. sections of the studio were painted deep strong colors and pieces of wood and other material were used to break up and section the space. sort of painting in space, this was for the me the apex of my “structural work” and from this point i veered off into making earth works.with these installations i encouraged the viewer to physically interact with the work, in order to experience the entire room it was necessary to clamber over pallets and other obstacles stacked up in the space. These items were also painted and arranged according to my taste. i think inm the end i got tired of the profound difficulty at knowing what to take from this and how to see it beyond my studio environment. i think in many ways it was more an incubatory for me to find a way of working more so than an end result. that said, this is exactly the type of large scale installation i’d like to find a way to produce. later on in carbondale the unfolding sculptures were an attempt to create an easily deployable module that unfolded could produce a level of spatial fragmentation like these pieces. i think that one recurring theme in all my work, and with holly too, has been portability. from time to time i make works that are patently impossible to move easily and these pieces are the flip side of the drive towards mobility. but i keep coming back to this MANPORT / MANPAD production. …. hmmm. (p.s. sorry about all the dust, i need ot clean the scanner).
Studio Installation, mixed media, 1996 / 97
Column, LCAD degree show part II
Column, earth, wood, 1997
Sculpture from degree / thesis show at Loughborough College of Art, 1997. This piece was made using a plywood mold in 2 sections. prior to dumping any of the dirt inside i insert the "space frame" a sol le wit ish construction. this exo skeleton was intended to help keep the piece together. however when it came time to deinstall the sculpture withstood several blows from a pick axe to even put a dent in it. in the end i had to push it over. which given that i thought in was going to fall over is pretty cool.
this general idea with this piece was to create something that was life size, by which i mean to scale with with me the artist. i was influenced by david smith at the time and his idea of a piece that one could see over, …. just…. on tip toes. the rest of the installation had a piece the was much taller than a person (the pyramid) and one that in longer than a person but on the floor and one that we can step over easily.
of the whole installation this piece became the most "representational" in the sense that it immediately resembled a core sample taken from the earth. the part about the piece i found most fascinating was how the sections of earth transcribed my moods. for instance there was a period when i was working when i was feeling very discombobulated later on i could point out that specific section so in that sense the column recorded a moment in time.
comedy friday
Working Lunch, Ceramic and spray paint, 1992/1993
it’s friday night, so i’m uploading a comedy piece. it’s a ceramic that i did at high school i think in like 1992 maybe ’91, it has since been trashed i think (i hope), u totally cannot really tell, but it’s meant to be a sandwich with a yorkshire style mill on top of it, “working lunch” …. geddit? the pyschadelic blobby thing below the black mass is how i wrote my name at the time “tom” all crazy stylee, would be better if i had 2 separate photos one of each “Artwork”. significantly i photographed both items on top of a trash can. also it’s a nice blue that makes the whole image bearable in my opinion.
Studio / bedroom… 1st year at L’boro
Studio view, 1995
My first year at LCAD i shared a room in the halls of residence with Andrew Poulter. Andy went on to do his MA at Chelsea College of Art in London then disappear off the face of the earth. His paintings were clemente-esqe and u can see one of them to the left nestled between the larger blue canvas on the right nad the tree of the left. i was utterly lost at this point in my art practice and was borrowing from Andy a bit in terms of figurative stuff, hence the blue canvas on the wall. i guess the arm is “reaching” for something… a figure that seems to be backing away. maybe i knew this figurative stuff wasn’t for me at the time and this painting tells truth. who knows… but i loved the fact we painted in there 24 hours a day all the time to the banging sounds of the KLF, 808 State and any acid house tape Andy could lay his hands on. I think for a while we had every tape, LP and bootleg CD of the KLF in all it’s various guises and would belt them out much to the chargrin of our neighbors i think. the lights we always low and the curtains drawn. Andy painted in these super bright colors but when u took his canvases outside to transport them to school for crits they were like sun beams, painfully bright….. the tree was dragged in one night, i think i wanted to draw from nature so instead of leave the studio we brought nature inside, albeit a dead tree. i think we kept it till pretty much the end of the year. when we moved out we filled the holes in the walls with cotton wool and covered them with paper and corn flakes to simulate the wall paper…. Andy if u r out there and u find this post email me: tom@tomburtonwood.com
First land art project
Untitled (?), dirt, 1993
This is a photograph of the first “land art” i made and the first collaboration i really made. Dated somewhere between 1993 and 1994, this piece was the result of a collaboration between Simon Hankinson and myself. For me i found the whole process of collaborating on this piece very hard. at the time i had no idea what i wanted to do with the piece, and it really did not relate directly at all to what i was doing in the studio. Simon has this idea of cutting into the landscape, and neither of us had heard of Michael Heizer at the time. So we selected a clearing, in a copse of trees, half way up a hill, on the foothills of the Pennines. It lay across the M62 from the village of Outlane. The copse was in a public area accessed by trudging thru a golf course. So for several, usually soggy, saturdays we went up to this area and bumbled about first with string and so forth to lay out a patch to cut and then spades and shovels to clear 2-3 inches of sod from the ground and expose a wide but shallow trench. Presumably it’s overgrown and gone at this point. perhaps a minor dimple still exists marking our exertions. One day maybe i’ll go back up there and take a look and see if i can find it again. Anyhow this was during my time at Dewsbury College (now Batley School of Art i think). The faculty weren’t encouraging us to do much of anything at the time, let alone collaborate with each other (god forbid) or making land art. So in that sense this was a great project for me at the time as it opened my eyes up to other ways of working that weren’t just marks on paper or daubing on canvas. But i was way too closed off in my thinking to really appreciate what we were doing or why. It’s funny how i spent most of my youth trying to be this really conventional (traditional) artist and now i’m older i really don’t care less. Shouldn’t it work the other way round, blaze a trail in your youth and get more refined with age? i guess that’s the avant garde way, so i missed that boat too… i dunno. any how i’ve totally lost touch with Simon now and i’d really like to get in touch with him, so Simon if you’ve been googling yourself and found this web page / image please email me at tburtonwood@gmail.com i’d love to catch up and see what you are working on.
Mobile Sculpture, Carbondale, IL, 2000
This is one of my first experiments with mobile sculpture / art that can be deployed easily (in public, or elsewhere). This piece was constructed using cardboard boxes hoarded from the local liquor store, embedded around a garment rack and painted bright yellow. the intention at best was to create something utterly jarring to the every day, something completely absurd and drag it around the strip in carbondale for a photo opportunity. i guess i wasn’t really concerned with getting reaction / feedback from the public, as we did the “deployment” early one morning when the sky was blue but everyone else was still sleeping. gorilla suit assistance from David Lohman who helped in many significant and diverse ways thru carbondale experience 1998 – 2001 and onwards.
looking back and forwards i think the intention behind this piece is just fine, and again like a lot of my carbondale era work there’s a lot of humor in it, the materials- recyced cardboard and glue, are still staples of my diet here in chicago, so i can see more of these sculptures on the horizon, i’d like to cut the garment rack out and just make these lumpy balls, make maybe 10-15 different sizes, different colors and roll them around my neighborhood, i think that would be a lot of fun…..






































